CNN's projecting a McCain win for Republicans, with Clinton having a slim margin over Obama so far.
How is it that McCain can go from such an abysmal showing in Iowa to victory (such as it is) in New Hampshire? Same deal with Edwards, who I think was in the teens percentage wise.
New Hampshire
-
- 50 Helens Agree: Necros > All
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 2:49 pm
- Location: Apparently Ohio
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
-
- kNight of the Sun (oxymoron)
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:44 pm
Re: New Hampshire
The McCain victory was predicted weeks ago... don't get lost in the hoopla of these first few primaries / caucuses, they only really give candidates some momentum that they swing into Super Tuesday which is the only day that really matters. (the biggest exception being Dean whose early losses sank him, lol and that speech)
Walrus
Walrus
-
- Knight of the East & West
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 9:54 pm
- Location: /dev/null
- Contact:
Re: New Hampshire
isnt there like ..12 people in that state?
its like voicing a win in north dakota...
its like voicing a win in north dakota...
-
- Knight of the Rose Croix (zomg French)
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 7:05 pm
Re: New Hampshire
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Iowa is worthless, New Hampshire isn't all that much better. The real test now begins. Any Republican candidates making it to February can split the delegates six ways to Sunday. This race is heavily fragmented for the Republicans, but for the Democrats it's largely about how long Edwards decides to stay in it. I can't guess which way it'll go, but I suspect it will see-saw between Clinton and Obama right down to the wire. The media will probably act shocked on every reversal, they have so far...
-
- 50 Helens Agree: Necros > All
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 2:49 pm
- Location: Apparently Ohio
Re: New Hampshire
So are Iowa and New Hampshire sort of like "barometers" for those kinds of voters, even if they don't have many electoral votes in the end?
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: New Hampshire
Sort of..Arkaron wrote:So are Iowa and New Hampshire sort of like "barometers" for those kinds of voters, even if they don't have many electoral votes in the end?
But the real importance of Iowa and New Hampshire is the momentum candidates get or lose. People always want to back a winner. Thats why New Hampshire was so crucial to Clinton. By winning New Hampshire, she kept herself in the race, as far as the press was concerned. Also if a candidate lost two states, he/she endangers high-profile endorsements from unions and big names. If a candidate loses endorsements, it tends to affect the ability to raise campaign cash. And reduced cash can cripple a campaign.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: New Hampshire
What they REALLY are are barometers of two things: How deep your ground game can get and how well you can turn out general election type voters (Independants).Arkaron wrote:So are Iowa and New Hampshire sort of like "barometers" for those kinds of voters, even if they don't have many electoral votes in the end?
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.