I remember 88 to 92 when we would joke that way about Dan Quayle.Ddrak wrote:n fact, it would be kinda like GWB having Cheney as a VP - an insurance policy against assassination. They wouldn't dare assassinate him because if they did then Hillary would be President!
Dd
Clinton v. Obama
-
- Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
- Location: Minneapolis MN
Re: Clinton v. Obama
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
-
- Soverign Grand Postmaster General
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 9:47 am
- Location: Gukta
Re: Clinton v. Obama
I think it is a good thing that we can discuss such an issue and it be a reasonable and logical discussion where the only ones taking action are the drastic crackpots rather then widely accepted by society.Sad fact is this is 2008 and we still cant see past the color / gender issue in my opinion.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9535.html
I can’t believe he brought this up, after Hillary already admitted she (lied through her teeth) misspoke. I think the guy is pathological. In fact, I think both of them are. This will stir it all up again just when the dust was settling.
I can’t believe he brought this up, after Hillary already admitted she (lied through her teeth) misspoke. I think the guy is pathological. In fact, I think both of them are. This will stir it all up again just when the dust was settling.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- WTB New Title
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 2:36 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Oh yeah his words mean a lot to most people. Are we counting such fantasies as "I did not have sexual intercourse with that woman" as well as "i did not inhale !" ?
Ariannda, in every game its Ariannda !
Babymage !©
Arch Magus of 70 long ass seasons - RETIRED
Battle tag Ariannda #1491
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Babymage !©
Arch Magus of 70 long ass seasons - RETIRED
Battle tag Ariannda #1491
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
The thing is, Ari, is he's now telling people that maybe the flight and landing and reception were fraught with danger, when in fact, that wasn't the case, and also after Hillary ceded the point. It opens up the can of worms again, just when it was starting to reced for Hillary. And once the media give legs to this, it will remind people just how dishonest both of them are.
it takes a psychopath to stand up in front of so many people and intimate that the video footage of her smiling and hugging a small child belied the imminent danger to her life (and her daughter's life). It wasn't a war zone, no matter how hard he tries to spin it as a dangerous mission.
it takes a psychopath to stand up in front of so many people and intimate that the video footage of her smiling and hugging a small child belied the imminent danger to her life (and her daughter's life). It wasn't a war zone, no matter how hard he tries to spin it as a dangerous mission.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Oops....
Clinton busted. Retracts what he said.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/11 ... per-story/
He must really hate video cameras by now, and YouTube. Cockroaches hate the light of day.
Clinton busted. Retracts what he said.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/11 ... per-story/
He must really hate video cameras by now, and YouTube. Cockroaches hate the light of day.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Bad fucking Friday for the Clinton campaign...
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... questions/
Hillary busted on NAFTA. It seems she had no problem putting cash ($800,000) in her (nad Bill's) account from BIll giving speeches on behalf of a group that supports the Columbian free trade agreement, which she (lied) said she opposed.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... questions/
Hillary busted on NAFTA. It seems she had no problem putting cash ($800,000) in her (nad Bill's) account from BIll giving speeches on behalf of a group that supports the Columbian free trade agreement, which she (lied) said she opposed.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: Clinton v. Obama
So, will you dance naked in the streets when they die, or will you just burn them in effigy?
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
Re: Clinton v. Obama
I said it 6 years ago, and I'll say it again - Clinton and Bush are far more similar than they are different. The US will be better without either group in politics.
Dd
Dd
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
I'll actually make the pilgramage to piss on their graves.Partha wrote:So, will you dance naked in the streets when they die, or will you just burn them in effigy?
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- WTB New Title
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 2:36 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Clinton v. Obama
I'll be right behind you, only maybe i'll pour one for the homies... then laugh hystericallyEmbar Angylwrath wrote:I'll actually make the pilgramage to piss on their graves.Partha wrote:So, will you dance naked in the streets when they die, or will you just burn them in effigy?
Ariannda, in every game its Ariannda !
Babymage !©
Arch Magus of 70 long ass seasons - RETIRED
Battle tag Ariannda #1491
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
Babymage !©
Arch Magus of 70 long ass seasons - RETIRED
Battle tag Ariannda #1491
We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Better behind me than in front of me...
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Hillary is pro-gun!
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008 ... hurchgoer/
Oh wait....
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... gewanted=1
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008 ... hurchgoer/
Oh wait....
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... gewanted=1
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Soverign Grand Postmaster General
- Posts: 7183
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:06 am
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Well you know what they say......the waffle doesn't fall far from the tree....
It is funny how most if not all of the Bill Clinton supporters on this board are on Hillary for the same reasons a lot of republicans were on Bill for back in the day.
It is funny how most if not all of the Bill Clinton supporters on this board are on Hillary for the same reasons a lot of republicans were on Bill for back in the day.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la ... 9290.story
Are you lefties getting the picture yet? The Clintons see the White House as an investment tool. It's a place to spend 4-8 years building contacts and relationships, then leveraging those relationships into some serious cash.
Can any of you liberals point to a an ex-President (Democrat or Republican) that has made shit-tons of cash like Bill did after leaving office? Not that I begrudge the man his entrepreneurial spirit, I think its great. But you guys have been hoodwinked into believing the Clintons were about anything other than themselves.
Are you lefties getting the picture yet? The Clintons see the White House as an investment tool. It's a place to spend 4-8 years building contacts and relationships, then leveraging those relationships into some serious cash.
Can any of you liberals point to a an ex-President (Democrat or Republican) that has made shit-tons of cash like Bill did after leaving office? Not that I begrudge the man his entrepreneurial spirit, I think its great. But you guys have been hoodwinked into believing the Clintons were about anything other than themselves.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Where are you getting your fantasies that the announced Democrats on the board have universal love for the Clintons?
As far as shit-tons of cash, look at the Bush family. You think Poppa isn't rolling in it after his presidency? Or Carter?
As far as shit-tons of cash, look at the Bush family. You think Poppa isn't rolling in it after his presidency? Or Carter?
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Your past defense of Clinton speaks volumes...Partha wrote:Where are you getting your fantasies that the announced Democrats on the board have universal love for the Clintons?
As far as shit-tons of cash, look at the Bush family. You think Poppa isn't rolling in it after his presidency? Or Carter?
Making money after your presidency is much different from making money ON your past presidency. You get the difference right?
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Most ex-heads of state make a shit-ton of money on the speaking circuits simply because they were heads of state. Maybe I'm missing the picture you're trying to paint.
Dd
Dd
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: Clinton v. Obama
That's the part where the evil liberals use the money Clinton siphoned from people to set up his Presidential Treehouse, from which he will launch Gay Bombs upon unsuspecting red state folks.
Embar.
Embar.
Where are you getting your fantasies that the announced Democrats on the board have universal love for the Clintons?
Link away.Your past defense of Clinton speaks volumes...
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
- Location: Minneapolis MN
Re: Clinton v. Obama
George H W Bush Made quite a tidy sum.Embar Angylwrath wrote: Can any of you liberals point to a an ex-President (Democrat or Republican) that has made shit-tons of cash like Bill did after leaving office? Not that I begrudge the man his entrepreneurial spirit, I think its great. But you guys have been hoodwinked into believing the Clintons were about anything other than themselves.
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987