Clinton v. Obama

Dumbass pinko-nazi-neoconservative-hippy-capitalists.
Post Reply
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

What I'm scratching my head over is why Hillary's support base didn't drop more than it has, over the blatant lying on Bosnia. Do they simply not care she's been outed as a pathological liar?

There's no way she could confuse that event the way she did. It wasn't like.. "Hmmmm... did I land under sniper fire there? Or was it Africa? No, maybe it was China. Oh pooey, I've landed under sniper fire sooooo many times, I just can't recall all the dangerous places I've flown too"

She didn't mis-speak. It wasn't confusion resulting from exhaustion (and if it is, she should be disqualifed from the Presidency.. do you really want a confused, exhausted President picking up that red phone in the middle of the night, considering that she might "mis-speak" when she orders a nuke drop?)

She told a whopper. All to steal the limelight from Obama after his speech on race, and maybe to boost her credibility as a person tested in a crisis situation, or maybe to boost her foreign affairs image.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
Klast Brell
Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
Posts: 4315
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Minneapolis MN

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Klast Brell »

Half of Hillary's base is voting for her husband.
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
Kulaf
Soverign Grand Postmaster General
Posts: 7183
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:06 am

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Kulaf »

Klast Brell wrote:Half of Hillary's base is voting for her husband.
The OTHER pathological liar.
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_cont ... al_primary

The latest Rasmussen Poll shows a tightening race in PA. Clinton once held a double-digit lead over Obama there, and he's narrowed it just a 5% spread. Not looking good for Clinton here. If Obama can pull off a victory, it SHOULD force Hillary out of the race, if she has any respect at all for her party.

If that happens, I bet she uses the stick of party destruction to angle her way onto the ticket (which is a smart move for her). There might be a lot of pressure on Obama from party insiders to allow her spot as VP. And I bet Obama caves to it if she pushes it.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
Partha
Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
Posts: 11322
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
Location: Rockford, IL

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Partha »

She will not be VP. More likely choices are Sebelius, Webb, or Richardson.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant

"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Partha wrote:She will not be VP. More likely choices are Sebelius, Webb, or Richardson.
Do you mean.. she won't angle for a spot on the ticket? Or.. even if she does, Obama won't have her there?
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
Partha
Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
Posts: 11322
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
Location: Rockford, IL

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Partha »

Do you ever have an original thought on this board that doesn't include a meaningless question? Just wondering.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant

"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Dude.. take some Crampirin and join the PMSing thread with Tax and Harlowe and the rest of the females. It was a legit question. I don't know if you mean she'll never get on the ticket.. or that she won't want to be on the ticket. You really weren't all that clear (no surprise)

Oh, and I see you're still dodging my question in the other thread.

Pussy.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
Partha
Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
Posts: 11322
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
Location: Rockford, IL

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Partha »

Dude.. take some Crampirin and join the PMSing thread with Tax and Harlowe and the rest of the females. It was a legit question.
Sure it was. That is, if you have a brain that doesn't have any firing neurons.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant

"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
Klast Brell
Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
Posts: 4315
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Minneapolis MN

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Klast Brell »

Embar your constant attempts at "gotcha!" questions are getting tired.

BTW have you stopped beating your wife?
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Klast Brell wrote:Embar your constant attempts at "gotcha!" questions are getting tired.

BTW have you stopped beating your wife?
The tinfoil hat looks good on you, Klast. All I asked was if Partha thought Hillary wouldn't get on the ticket, even if she wanted to.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
Klast Brell
Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
Posts: 4315
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
Location: Minneapolis MN

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Klast Brell »

Well at least pointing out your behavior is having an effect. 2 whole posts without a rhetorical question. If anyone wants to take bets on how long he can keep it up, let me know.
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Klast Brell wrote:Well at least pointing out your behavior is having an effect. 2 whole posts without a rhetorical question. If anyone wants to take bets on how long he can keep it up, let me know.
And that's pretty much a rhetorical statement right there.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
User avatar
Select
VP: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:23 am
Location: Cabilis
Contact:

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Select »

All I asked was if Partha thought Hillary wouldn't get on the ticket, even if she wanted to.
Dude.. take some Crampirin and join the PMSing thread with Tax and Harlowe and the rest of the females. It was a legit question.
I disagree.
Image
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Disagree with what? That he shouldn't join the thread.. that I didn't ask what I said I asked.. or that what I asked was a legit question? Aren't you supposed to be showing us how much you could care less about Xil by typing half-page responses to him?
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
User avatar
Select
VP: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:23 am
Location: Cabilis
Contact:

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Select »

Do you have a problem with me posting here? I'm not restricted to particular threads. I'll come and go throughout the board as I please.

And I disagreed with your statement that "all you asked was..." It wasn't so innocent.
Image
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Select wrote:Do you have a problem with me posting here? I'm not restricted to particular threads. I'll come and go throughout the board as I please.

And I disagreed with your statement that "all you asked was..." It wasn't so innocent.
What was so nefarious about it then Select? You're making an accusation, so please explain yourself.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
User avatar
Select
VP: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 4189
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:23 am
Location: Cabilis
Contact:

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Select »

Nope.
Image
Embar Angylwrath
President: Rsak Fan Club
Posts: 11674
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
Location: Top of the food chain

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Embar Angylwrath »

Then don't expect to be taken serious.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.

Embar
Alarius
Rsak
Soverign Grand Postmaster General
Posts: 5365
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Gukta

Re: Clinton v. Obama

Post by Rsak »

As if anyone ever was taken seriously on this board.
Post Reply