Clinton v. Obama
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
What I'm scratching my head over is why Hillary's support base didn't drop more than it has, over the blatant lying on Bosnia. Do they simply not care she's been outed as a pathological liar?
There's no way she could confuse that event the way she did. It wasn't like.. "Hmmmm... did I land under sniper fire there? Or was it Africa? No, maybe it was China. Oh pooey, I've landed under sniper fire sooooo many times, I just can't recall all the dangerous places I've flown too"
She didn't mis-speak. It wasn't confusion resulting from exhaustion (and if it is, she should be disqualifed from the Presidency.. do you really want a confused, exhausted President picking up that red phone in the middle of the night, considering that she might "mis-speak" when she orders a nuke drop?)
She told a whopper. All to steal the limelight from Obama after his speech on race, and maybe to boost her credibility as a person tested in a crisis situation, or maybe to boost her foreign affairs image.
There's no way she could confuse that event the way she did. It wasn't like.. "Hmmmm... did I land under sniper fire there? Or was it Africa? No, maybe it was China. Oh pooey, I've landed under sniper fire sooooo many times, I just can't recall all the dangerous places I've flown too"
She didn't mis-speak. It wasn't confusion resulting from exhaustion (and if it is, she should be disqualifed from the Presidency.. do you really want a confused, exhausted President picking up that red phone in the middle of the night, considering that she might "mis-speak" when she orders a nuke drop?)
She told a whopper. All to steal the limelight from Obama after his speech on race, and maybe to boost her credibility as a person tested in a crisis situation, or maybe to boost her foreign affairs image.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
- Location: Minneapolis MN
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Half of Hillary's base is voting for her husband.
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
-
- Soverign Grand Postmaster General
- Posts: 7183
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:06 am
Re: Clinton v. Obama
The OTHER pathological liar.Klast Brell wrote:Half of Hillary's base is voting for her husband.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_cont ... al_primary
The latest Rasmussen Poll shows a tightening race in PA. Clinton once held a double-digit lead over Obama there, and he's narrowed it just a 5% spread. Not looking good for Clinton here. If Obama can pull off a victory, it SHOULD force Hillary out of the race, if she has any respect at all for her party.
If that happens, I bet she uses the stick of party destruction to angle her way onto the ticket (which is a smart move for her). There might be a lot of pressure on Obama from party insiders to allow her spot as VP. And I bet Obama caves to it if she pushes it.
The latest Rasmussen Poll shows a tightening race in PA. Clinton once held a double-digit lead over Obama there, and he's narrowed it just a 5% spread. Not looking good for Clinton here. If Obama can pull off a victory, it SHOULD force Hillary out of the race, if she has any respect at all for her party.
If that happens, I bet she uses the stick of party destruction to angle her way onto the ticket (which is a smart move for her). There might be a lot of pressure on Obama from party insiders to allow her spot as VP. And I bet Obama caves to it if she pushes it.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: Clinton v. Obama
She will not be VP. More likely choices are Sebelius, Webb, or Richardson.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Do you mean.. she won't angle for a spot on the ticket? Or.. even if she does, Obama won't have her there?Partha wrote:She will not be VP. More likely choices are Sebelius, Webb, or Richardson.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Do you ever have an original thought on this board that doesn't include a meaningless question? Just wondering.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Dude.. take some Crampirin and join the PMSing thread with Tax and Harlowe and the rest of the females. It was a legit question. I don't know if you mean she'll never get on the ticket.. or that she won't want to be on the ticket. You really weren't all that clear (no surprise)
Oh, and I see you're still dodging my question in the other thread.
Pussy.
Oh, and I see you're still dodging my question in the other thread.
Pussy.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Sure it was. That is, if you have a brain that doesn't have any firing neurons.Dude.. take some Crampirin and join the PMSing thread with Tax and Harlowe and the rest of the females. It was a legit question.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
- Location: Minneapolis MN
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Embar your constant attempts at "gotcha!" questions are getting tired.
BTW have you stopped beating your wife?
BTW have you stopped beating your wife?
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
The tinfoil hat looks good on you, Klast. All I asked was if Partha thought Hillary wouldn't get on the ticket, even if she wanted to.Klast Brell wrote:Embar your constant attempts at "gotcha!" questions are getting tired.
BTW have you stopped beating your wife?
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:17 am
- Location: Minneapolis MN
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Well at least pointing out your behavior is having an effect. 2 whole posts without a rhetorical question. If anyone wants to take bets on how long he can keep it up, let me know.
"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not." - Ronald Reagan 1987
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
And that's pretty much a rhetorical statement right there.Klast Brell wrote:Well at least pointing out your behavior is having an effect. 2 whole posts without a rhetorical question. If anyone wants to take bets on how long he can keep it up, let me know.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
- Select
- VP: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:23 am
- Location: Cabilis
- Contact:
Re: Clinton v. Obama
All I asked was if Partha thought Hillary wouldn't get on the ticket, even if she wanted to.
I disagree.Dude.. take some Crampirin and join the PMSing thread with Tax and Harlowe and the rest of the females. It was a legit question.

-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Disagree with what? That he shouldn't join the thread.. that I didn't ask what I said I asked.. or that what I asked was a legit question? Aren't you supposed to be showing us how much you could care less about Xil by typing half-page responses to him?
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
- Select
- VP: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:23 am
- Location: Cabilis
- Contact:
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Do you have a problem with me posting here? I'm not restricted to particular threads. I'll come and go throughout the board as I please.
And I disagreed with your statement that "all you asked was..." It wasn't so innocent.
And I disagreed with your statement that "all you asked was..." It wasn't so innocent.

-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
What was so nefarious about it then Select? You're making an accusation, so please explain yourself.Select wrote:Do you have a problem with me posting here? I'm not restricted to particular threads. I'll come and go throughout the board as I please.
And I disagreed with your statement that "all you asked was..." It wasn't so innocent.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
- Select
- VP: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:23 am
- Location: Cabilis
- Contact:
-
- President: Rsak Fan Club
- Posts: 11674
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:31 am
- Location: Top of the food chain
Re: Clinton v. Obama
Then don't expect to be taken serious.
Correction Mr. President, I DID build this, and please give Lurker a hug, we wouldn't want to damage his self-esteem.
Embar
Alarius
Embar
Alarius
-
- Soverign Grand Postmaster General
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 9:47 am
- Location: Gukta
Re: Clinton v. Obama
As if anyone ever was taken seriously on this board.