Feels bad man...
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics ... ive/60403/
FISA goes forward
-
- Sublime Prince of teh Royal Sekrut Strat
- Posts: 3419
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 10:39 am
- Location: Brothel Relbeeks Mother Whores Herself From
FISA goes forward
Fallakin Kuvari wrote:Because laws that require voters to have an ID (Something they are required to have anyway) are bad....
-
- Reading is fundamental!!!1!!
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:42 am
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: FISA goes forward
Because SCARY MUSLIMS WILL KILL YOU ALL AND RAPE YOUR DOG, THAT'S WHY. NOW SHUT UP, COMMIE HIPPIE SCUM.
Well, it’s the Super-Monroe Doctrine: “Get off our oil, people who dress funny!” - M. Bouffant
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
"You're a bad captain, Zarde. People like you only learn by being touched, and hard. And you will greatly disapprove of where these men put their hands." - M. Vanderbeam.
-
- Soverign Grand Postmaster General
- Posts: 7183
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:06 am
Re: FISA goes forward
I would love to see FISA declared an unconstitutional impingement on the Executives sole Constitutional power to gather foreign intelligence.
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
Re: FISA goes forward
The fundamental problem is you don't know if you're gathering foreign intel or not until you start looking. The Executive has no right to gather any information on domestic events, so there's a problem.
Dd
Dd
-
- Soverign Grand Postmaster General
- Posts: 7183
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:06 am
Re: FISA goes forward
There's no problem. The only problem would arrise if the government attempted to use what they learned against someone in a court of law. Using it simply as a tool to stop potential attacks would not in anyway violate anyones rights. It would clearly fall into the exigent circumstances exception to needing a warrent.
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
Re: FISA goes forward
You can only claim exigent circumstances if you know for sure that something is happening, not to determine if something is happening. It's the doctrine that lets cops follow a fleeing criminal into their home, but not bug someone's home to prove they are a criminal.Kulaf wrote:There's no problem. The only problem would arrise if the government attempted to use what they learned against someone in a court of law. Using it simply as a tool to stop potential attacks would not in anyway violate anyones rights. It would clearly fall into the exigent circumstances exception to needing a warrent.
Similarly, there's no doctrine that says it's ok for the cops to search your house as long as they don't use anything. As phone conversations are treated in the same way letters in the mail are, there's no doctrine that lets them listen to your phone calls but not use what they find. The act of listening itself breaches your fourth amendment rights.
Dd
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
Re: FISA goes forward
Although, more worrisome than FISA:
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB1 ... DMyWj.html
Dd
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB1 ... DMyWj.html
NCTC can go on fishing trips, and hand your government records to any other nation they feel like. Awesome!The rules now allow the little-known National Counterterrorism Center to examine the government files of U.S. citizens for possible criminal behavior, even if there is no reason to suspect them. That is a departure from past practice, which barred the agency from storing information about ordinary Americans unless a person was a terror suspect or related to an investigation.
Now, NCTC can copy entire government databases—flight records, casino-employee lists, the names of Americans hosting foreign-exchange students and many others. The agency has new authority to keep data about innocent U.S. citizens for up to five years, and to analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior. Previously, both were prohibited. Data about Americans "reasonably believed to constitute terrorism information" may be permanently retained.
The changes also allow databases of U.S. civilian information to be given to foreign governments for analysis of their own. In effect, U.S. and foreign governments would be using the information to look for clues that people might commit future crimes.
Dd