http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 38341.html
The world is a much bigger place than the middle east with a nod towards China. Russia and North Korea? South America and economics? A little more diversity here would have been helpful.* America’s role in the world
* Our longest war – Afghanistan and Pakistan
* Red Lines – Israel and Iran
* The Changing Middle East and the New Face of Terrorism – I
* The Changing Middle East and the New Face of Terrorism – II
* The Rise of China and Tomorrow’s World
I think any sitting President has a huge advantage in a debate about foreign policy, so this is Obama's to lose. Obama is better briefed, and knows the landscape more intimately than is possible for Romney. So Romney gets a win if he just holds his own. If he beats the Benghazi drum too hard or too long, he risks being seen as just pointing out failures without a substantive difference in his policy, and he'll lose voters on that. As for Obama, his smart play would be to say "Yep, we fumbled on that one, and regrettably, it cost Americans their lives. Mistakes are made, and we do everything we can to make sure we learn from them, and improve."
That would take Romney's biggest bullet out of his gun. But I doubt Obama will do that... he'll likely defend the Benghazi incident as being handled well. As for Obama's bullets, he has plenty, especially with those topics. He has Osama bin Laden, he has the Iran sanctions (part of a world effort) and he has the quasi-successful campaign against al-Queida. That's a lot of ammo against Romney. We'll see how it goes.