Lurker wrote:Rush actually said what Harlowe posted too.
Yes, the first quote was direct dialog where he said nothing of Obama. I meant the dialog that included Obama, which was a lead-in to him talking about the ABC healthcare infomercial where Obama said:
But what we can do is make sure that at least some of the waste that exists in the system that's not making anybody's mom better, that is loading up on additional tests or additional drugs that the evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve care, that at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.
In response to:
She's 105 now. Over 105. But at 100 the doctor had said to her, I can't do anything more unless you have a pacemaker. I said, go for it. She said, go for it. But the arrhythmia specialist said, no, it's too old. Her doctor said, I'm going to make an appointment, because a picture is worth a thousand words. And when the other arrhythmia specialist saw her, saw her joy of life and so on, he said, I'm going for it. So that was over five years ago. My question to you is, outside the medical criteria for prolonging life for somebody elderly, is there any consideration that can be given for a certain spirit, a certain joy of living, quality of life? Or is it just a medical cutoff at a certain age?
That is how 'Spirit" and Obama got drug into it, as a segue-way for talking about healthcare. Let me highlight the sentence in Rush's dialog which relates it to everyone's spirit for you:
The point is there are a lot of people whose spirit is just broken.
So no, the Huffington Post commentary (the second quotation) wasn't exactly what he said. The first quotation, which was never in question, was direct quotes from Rush. As I said, "what did Rush actually say in regards to Sanford and Obama?". It was a horrible segue-way, for sure, but Huffington Post portrayed it incorrectly.