QFEDdrak wrote:While I don't condone copyright infringement, I still have serious problems with it being equated to theft. If someone steals your lunch then you no longer have lunch. If someone steals your car then you no longer have a car. If someone makes unauthorized copies of your work then you do still have your work and can make other sales.
It gets even weirder though. If you ask the MPAA/RIAA then you don't actually own anything when you buy a DVD or CD. You are entering into a licensing contract where the copyright holder grants you the right to play the work in a limited fashion (technically you can't have friends over to watch movies or let someone else listen to your CD) for the one-time payment you make at the store. With software, it's even worse and you may not even have the legal right to resell things you buy (despite GameStop etc. making a packet from it) because you aren't actually *buying* anything and if you lose your media then good luck trying to get another copy from the publishers despite your still having the right to it.
In addition, copyright for life+75 years (or whatever it's at these days) is just plain broken. I can handle a period of 5-10 years but beyond that things should enter the public domain for anyone to take and improve on. Copyright should exist to foster advancement and not as a protection racket - if you can't make something better after having exclusive rights for 10 years then it's time to let someone else try.
So, while I don't condone copyright infringement I can't feel too bad for media publishers that have had a virtual monopoly on distribution who continually engage in a whole swathe of unethical and immoral tactics to protect their outdated and dying business models.
This movie sucked ass. Don't waste any money on it, IMO. A great marketing team is all it takes to make a great blockbuster these days.