Guilty....until ressurection

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:53 pm

Isn't it a farce to put something like this in a plea deal even if the defendant believes it could happen?

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/03/31/cul ... index.html

Minute · Post by **Minute** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:42 pm

I agree, to allow this in the plea is to acknowledge that she isn't in fact guilty, because it was the will of God.

Post by **Ddrak** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:52 am

That's just screwy. She should be classed as not guilty by reason of insanity from what I read there.

Dd

Beestyall · Post by **Beestyall** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:49 am

Consider it a wacko version of immunity. It's actually really smart, by doing this, the chick gets the help she needs (fixed delusions anyone) and allows for quick, meaniful prosecution of 3 or 4 other people involved. Without this, there was serious doubt if they could get a quick resolution to this at trial.

Trollbait · Post by **Trollbait** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:01 pm

I view it as coercion and prosecutorial trickery.

Fobbon Lazyfoot · Post by **Fobbon Lazyfoot** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:12 pm

I want it to happen.

Oh man will that DA's ears be red!

Klast Brell · Post by **Klast Brell** » Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:02 am

This does not sway my feelings about religion.

Brell Rants

Guilty....until ressurection

Guilty....until ressurection

Re: Guilty....until ressurection

Re: Guilty....until ressurection

Re: Guilty....until ressurection

Re: Guilty....until ressurection

Re: Guilty....until ressurection

Re: Guilty....until ressurection